It's amazing and combines everything that he is so good at.
A PERFECT WORLD MOVIE WATCH MOVIE
Butch isn't a nice guy, we see plenty of examples of this, but he is kind to the boy, and Phillip isn't a cute movie kid, and with his natural performance and expressive face, he does not come off as a child actor either (which is the highest compliment I can give) This isn't just KC's best performance, it's probably my personal favourite KC performance too. The heart of the movie is the relationship between Butch and Phillip. The movie has a prison break, a kidnapping and murders but it's not really about any of their things, it's so much deeper than that. Not only because A Perfect World features the best performance of KC's career, it may also the best movie Clint Eastwood has directed, yes I am including my own personal favourite, The Outlaw Josie Wales and Oscar winning Unforgiven in that statement. The trailers didn't really help, as they were uninspiring to say the least, and didn't convey the tone of the movie at all. KC was Hollywoods golden boy, producing hit after hit (Dances With Wolves, Prince Of Thieves, JFK and The Bodyguard) whilst Eastwood had just won a pair of Oscars for Unforgiven, and had a hit with In The Line Of Fire, yet for some reason audiences stayed away. On paper, the film should have produced an instant box office hit. Lowther) In hot pursuit is a Texas Ranger, Red Garrett (Clint Eastwood) A Perfect World is not a great movie, it's an underrated masterpiece that has somehow slipped through the cracks, despite great reviews (I remember one saying "You'll be Unforgiven For Missing A Perfect World) it was overlooked on its initial release, and has been largely forgotten since. Plot In A Paragraph: Butch Haynes (KC) escapes from prison and kidnaps a young boy (T.J. Perhaps it's time to stop thinking so linearly.Reviewed by slightlymad22 10 / 10 Kevin Costner's Greatest PerformanceĬontinuing my plan to watch every Kevin Costner movie in order, I come to 1993's A Perfect World. She-Hulk seems to only come in the Multiverse Saga because it's in Phase 5 and follows the events of both Shang-Chi and Endgame. Similarly, Shang-Chi introduces Ta Lo as another dimension, but isn't the same for the same reason. Ms Marvel does explore the existence of the Noor Dimension, but it isn't really a multiverse story any more than Doctor Strange is for entering the Dark Dimension. Looking at the remainder of the "Multiverse Saga" after removing the post- Endgame stories, it's hard to justify why Eternals, Moon Knight, Werewolf By Night, Ms Marvel and The Marvels are even classed as Multiverse stories. Introducing so many branching storylines and suggesting they're all strictly to be watched in the order Marvel say is limiting. Presumably, some of those releases are included so they build up the characters who are set to appear in the Avengers movies at its end, but calling Phase 4 the Multiverse Saga, when it was clearly so tied to the Infinity Saga is ultimately just jarring. The so-called Multiverse Saga that kicked off in Phase 4 has so far had considerably less than half of its releases in any way tied to the Multiverse, even tangentially. There are just too many releases to justify Marvel continuing the static Phase approach. But then there's the question of the other releases that don't so easily fit into the Multiverse Saga.
A PERFECT WORLD MOVIE WATCH PLUS
Reframing Phase 4 as a sort of Endgame epilogue means all the storylines Endgame seeded can be dealt with, without them creeping back in even as the MCU has supposedly moved on.
0 kommentar(er)
